Rover 400 1998 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 35 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 6, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mazda Xedos 6. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mazda Xedos 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Kia Carnival | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 9 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 400 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.36 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. The Mazda Xedos 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |