Rover 400 1997 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 400 engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 6, but torque is 40 NM more than Mazda Xedos 6. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 400 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.36 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. The Mazda Xedos 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |