Rover 400 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 1996

 
Rover 400
1998 - 1999
Seat Cordoba
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP60 HP
Torque: 127 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds15.7 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 43 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.86.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 400 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway840 km on highway
690 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.14 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Rover 400 is larger, but slightly lower.
Rover 400 is 35 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
810 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba.
Gross weight (kg): 1`550750
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv