Rover 400 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 127 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 400 engine produces 43 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 400 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Rover 400 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 400 is 35 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |