Rover 400 1992 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 167 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Rover 400 engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 18 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.9 | |
Rover 400 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 400 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 23 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 200 | Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Rover 400 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`045 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |