Rover 400 1996 vs Kia Sephia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Rover 400 engine produces 6 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Kia Sephia. Despite the higher power, Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.9 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 400 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
720 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Rover 400 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |