Rover 400 1995 vs Kia Sephia 1996

 
Rover 400
1995 - 1999
Kia Sephia
1996 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 112 HP80 HP
Torque: 145 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds11.2 seconds
Rover 400 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 400 engine produces 32 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Kia Sephia. Thanks to more power Rover 400 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 400 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that by driving the Rover 400 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 400 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway810 km on highway
690 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.25 m
Width: 1.70 m1.69 m
Height: 1.39 m1.39 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 370 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
720 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Rover 400 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6401`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Rover 400 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv