Rover 400 1996 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 175 HP | 107 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 240 NM | 138 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14 seconds | 9.3 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.2 | 7.5 - 9.3 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Xedos 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.35 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. The Mazda Xedos 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |