Rover 400 1996 vs Hyundai Lantra 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 175 HP | 68 - 139 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 240 NM | 120 - 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14 seconds | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.2 | 6.4 - 9.7 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Lantra. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Lantra, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
| |