Rover 400 1996 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 175 HP | 60 - 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 240 NM | 116 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14 seconds | 10.1 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.2 | 4.9 - 9.2 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 400 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 400 is 35 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |