Rover 400 1996 vs Hyundai Sonata 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 86 - 175 HP | 133 - 175 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 240 NM | 169 - 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14 seconds | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.2 | 8.9 - 10.0 | |
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Sonata. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 22 cm shorter than the Hyundai Sonata, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 396 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 374 litres | |
Rover 400 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 400 has 74 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Sonata. The Hyundai Sonata may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 400 (by 436 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Hyundai Sonata, which means Rover 400 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`926 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Hyundai Sonata has
| |