Rover 400 1995 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 400 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Corolla has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 136 HP | 72 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 120 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 14 seconds | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 6.4 - 8.7 | |
|
On average, the Rover 400 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Toyota Corolla. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 400 is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 400 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 372 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
7320 litres | no data | |
| Rover 400 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Rover 400 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`642 | ~ 1`608 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |