Rover 400 1995 vs Seat Toledo 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 400 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Seat Toledo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 136 HP | 64 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 124 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 14 seconds | 8.4 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 5.1 - 9.7 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Toledo. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 400 and Seat Toledo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
7320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`642 | ~ 1`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |