Rover 400 1995 vs Mazda 626 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 400 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 626 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 136 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 145 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 14 seconds | 9.6 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 5.2 - 8.9 | |
|
Rover 400 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Rover 400 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 400 is smaller. Rover 400 is 26 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 400 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
7320 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Rover 400 has 132 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 400 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`642 | ~ 1`703 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 400 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |