Rover 25 1999 vs Peugeot 206 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Rover 25 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Peugeot 206 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 1.1 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 60 - 75 HP | |
Torque: | 95 - 240 NM | 94 - 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 13.5 seconds | 13.1 - 16.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.2 | 4.0 - 6.3 | |
Rover 25 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Rover 25 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.99 m | 3.87 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 12 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 992 litres | |
Rover 25 has more luggage capacity. Rover 25 has 59 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 94 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Rover 25 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`513 | ~ 1`427 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |