Rover 200 1992 vs Volkswagen Golf 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, but torque is 13 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.9 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
| Rover 200 is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 448 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |