Rover 200 1991 vs Mazda 323 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 200 engine produces 28 HP less power than Mazda 323, but torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 8.0 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller, but slightly higher. Rover 200 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 200 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. The Mazda 323 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |