Rover 200 1992 vs Mercedes SLK 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 200 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mercedes SLK has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Rover 200 is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes SLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 122 HP | 136 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 138 NM | 190 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.5 | 9.1 - 9.5 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.29 m | |
| Rover 200 is 22 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 155 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`565 | ~ 1`548 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |