Rover 200 1992 vs BMW 3 series 1993

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Rover 200
1992 - 2000
BMW 3 series
1993 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
Rover 200 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas BMW 3 series has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Rover 200 is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 1.61.8 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 103 - 122 HP115 - 193 HP
Torque: 127 - 138 NM168 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 10.1 seconds7.7 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.1 - 8.58.1 - 11.0
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.43 m
Width: 1.68 m1.71 m
Height: 1.39 m1.35 m
Rover 200 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Rover 200 is 21 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres230 litres
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Rover 200 has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`565~ 1`820
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no data7400
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • manual gearbox only
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
BMW 3 sērija has
  • both manual and automatic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv