Rover 200 1992 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 122 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 138 NM | 186 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | 7.3 - 8.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.5 | 9.6 - 11.2 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo Spider. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller, but higher. Rover 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Spider, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 110 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 200 has 190 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Spider. The Alfa Romeo Spider may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`565 | ~ 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |