Rover 200 1995 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 50 - 116 HP | |
Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 86 - 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.3 seconds | 9.7 - 19.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 7.8 | 4.8 - 9.2 | |
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, Rover 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 802 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Rover 200 has 151 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. This could mean that the Rover 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 284 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`527 | ~ 1`453 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |