Rover 200 1990 vs Seat Toledo 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 200 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 237 NM | 124 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12.5 seconds | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 5.7 - 9.1 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Toledo. On average, a Rover 200 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Seat Toledo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`569 | ~ 1`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |