Rover 200 1990 vs Fiat Croma 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.9 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 200 HP | 92 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 237 NM | 162 - 247 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12.5 seconds | 8.2 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 5.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat Croma. On average, Rover 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 30 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`569 | ~ 1`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |