Rover 100 1990 vs Kia Pride 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 52 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Rover 100 engine produces 8 HP more power than Kia Pride, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Kia Pride. Despite the higher power, Rover 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Rover 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 100 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Pride, which means that by driving the Rover 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 38 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Rover 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.52 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 100 is smaller. Rover 100 is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Pride, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 100 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 229 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
552 litres | 750 litres | |
|
Kia Pride has more luggage space. Rover 100 has 101 litres less trunk space than the Kia Pride. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Pride (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 100 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Pride, which means Rover 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 100 has
|
Kia Pride has
| |