Renault Trafic 2001 vs Mercedes Vito 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 19.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Trafic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Trafic engine produces 32 HP more power than Mercedes Vito, but torque is 30 NM less than Mercedes Vito. Thanks to more power Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Trafic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`905 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
| |