Renault Scenic 2009 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 14 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 3 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Renault Scenic has 113 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |