Renault Scenic 2001 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, but torque is 20 NM less than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Used also on Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.57 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 13 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Scenic is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1848 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |