Renault Scenic 2001 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 31 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 104 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller, but higher. Renault Scenic is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |