Renault Scenic 2004 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Despite less power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller. Renault Scenic is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 70 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |