Renault Scenic 2003 vs Opel Combo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 55 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.4 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.80 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 6 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 12 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 25 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Opel Combo has
| |