Renault Scenic 2009 vs Renault Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic 2009 and Renault Scenic 2012 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Renault Scenic 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic 2009 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic 2012, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic 2009 is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic 2012, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1870 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic 2012 has more luggage space. Renault Scenic 2009 has 33 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic 2012. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic 2012 (by 33 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`953 | 1`973 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |