Renault Scenic 2009 vs Fiat Doblo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 20 HP more power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Fiat Doblo. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Scenic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Fiat Grande Punto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Fiat Doblo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.85 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 5 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 353 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`944 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Doblo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |