Renault Scenic 2016 vs Ford C-Max 2014

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Scenic
2016 -
Ford C-Max
2014 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel)1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 95 - 160 HP85 - 185 HP
Torque: 190 - 380 NM141 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 - 14.2 seconds8.5 - 15.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.9 - 6.03.8 - 6.5
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, a Renault Scenic with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford C-Max.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.38 m
Width: 1.87 m1.83 m
Height: 1.65 m1.63 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 572 litres544 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1554 litres1684 litres
Renault Scenic has 28 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 130 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`071~ 1`949
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 11 0009200
Pros and Cons: Renault Scenic has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
Ford C-Max has
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv