Renault Scenic 2001 vs Renault Megane 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 140 HP | 65 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 200 NM | 114 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | 8.9 - 18.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.5 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller, but higher. Renault Scenic is 28 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Scenic is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1310 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`306 | ~ 1`641 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Megane has
| |