Renault Scenic 2001 vs Opel Meriva 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 140 HP | 70 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 200 NM | 125 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | 11.3 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.5 | 5.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Meriva. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 13 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Meriva. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`306 | ~ 1`844 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |