Renault Scenic 2001 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 140 HP | 110 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 200 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.5 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Scenic. On average, a Renault Scenic with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Renault Grand Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Scenic is 39 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`306 | ~ 2`136 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |