Renault Scenic 2001 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 140 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 200 NM | 135 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | 12.2 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.5 | 5.5 - 8.7 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Scenic is 11 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`306 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |