Renault Scenic 2003 vs Opel Meriva 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 163 HP | 70 - 125 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 125 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | 11.3 - 17.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.6 | 5.0 - 7.9 | |
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Meriva. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.62 m | |
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 22 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 360 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1410 litres | |
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Scenic has 70 litres more trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 430 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Meriva. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 1`844 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |