Renault Scenic 2003 vs Kia Picanto 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 163 HP | 62 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 86 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | 15.1 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.6 | 4.4 - 5.8 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 73 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 21 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 157 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Scenic has 273 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 1.5 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Renault Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |