Renault Scenic 2003 vs Ford C-Max 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 163 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.6 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, a Renault Scenic with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Scenic is 8 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Renault Scenic has 120 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 1`958 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |