Renault Scenic 2009 vs Renault Scenic 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 160 HP | 110 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 380 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 13.4 seconds | 9.1 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.7 | 4.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Renault Scenic 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic 2012. On average, Renault Scenic 2009 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic 2009 is 6 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic 2012, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1870 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic 2012 has more luggage space. Renault Scenic 2009 has 33 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic 2012. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic 2012 (by 33 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`973 | ~ 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |