Renault Scenic 2009 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Scenic
2009 - 2012
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2004 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 110 - 160 HP90 - 137 HP
Torque: 151 - 380 NM135 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 - 13.4 seconds10.8 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 7.74.9 - 8.7
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.31 m4.28 m
Width: 1.85 m1.75 m
Height: 1.64 m1.64 m
Renault Scenic is larger, but slightly lower.
Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 437 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1837 litresno data
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Renault Scenic has 113 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`973~ 1`267
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 34002200
Pros and Cons: Renault Scenic has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv