Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 54 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 44 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |