Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Opel Combo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Combo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 17 HP less power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Opel Combo. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.2 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Meriva, Opel Corsa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 32 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2500 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 95 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |