Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Peugeot 3008 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 159 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kadjar engine produces 29 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 219 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 3008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 3008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Kadjar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1482 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Kadjar has 48 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`918 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |