Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Peugeot 3008 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Renault Kadjar engine produces 30 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 3008. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Renault Kadjar has 4x4: Kadjar has an automatic four-wheel drive system with three modes: 2WD, AUTO and LOCK. In 2WD and AUTO modes, it`s a front-wheel drive vehicle under normal conditions. In AUTO mode, if wheel spin is detected, up to 50% of torque can be sent to the rear wheels. In LOCK mode, the center differential is engaged to provide a preset 50/50 power distribution between the front and rear axles. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 219 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 3008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 3008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Kadjar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1482 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Kadjar has 48 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`139 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |