Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kadjar engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Thanks to more power Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.9 | |
| Renault Kadjar consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Renault Kadjar has 4x4: Kadjar has an automatic four-wheel drive system with three modes: 2WD, AUTO and LOCK. In 2WD and AUTO modes, it`s a front-wheel drive vehicle under normal conditions. In AUTO mode, if wheel spin is detected, up to 50% of torque can be sent to the rear wheels. In LOCK mode, the center differential is engaged to provide a preset 50/50 power distribution between the front and rear axles. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is smaller. Renault Kadjar is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Renault Kadjar has 143 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |