Renault Grand Scenic 2016 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 38 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 21 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 189 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 189 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 537 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`397 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |