Renault Grand Espace 2002 vs Chrysler Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Espace engine produces 10 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.7 | |
| Renault Grand Espace consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Espace could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Renault Grand Espace is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`605 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |