Renault Grand Espace 2006 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Espace engine produces 65 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 12.7 | |
| Renault Grand Espace consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Espace, Renault VEL Satis | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is smaller. Renault Grand Espace is 24 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Renault Grand Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`600 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |