Renault Grand Espace 2006 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Espace engine produces 35 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.7 | |
| Renault Grand Espace consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Renault Grand Espace is 5 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |